There’s good news and not-so-good news.
The good news: My latest scans, now a week and a half ago, were good. I hadn’t expected
the scans to take place quite so soon – they were scheduled for a date while my
latest two-week round of chemotherapy via the pump was ongoing, rather than for
somewhere during the two weeks off from chemotherapy that would follow, as had
seemed to be the custom. The good thing about moving the scan date up, I
thought, was that if the results were bad then we’d have the two weeks off from
chemotherapy to use on looking for a new treatment, and perhaps wouldn’t miss
any treatment time. The bad thing was that I wondered if the oncologist thought
we might in fact need those two weeks off for exactly this purpose.
As it turned out, however, we don’t need to go searching for
a new treatment, such as a clinical trial, because the scans showed that the
current treatment is continuing to make progress. More specifically, it appears
that the various small tumors I have are getting smaller. There is (and perhaps
has been all along) one decidedly larger tumor, and this one we were told is more
or less stable. But the good news about that one is that it may actually be
dying. As the oncologist said, it’s hard to see via the scans, but this was the
first time I’d heard this possibility spelled out and treated so seriously. So
that was the good news.
The not-so-good news: Teresa and I came home from the very
encouraging meeting with the oncologist, and the draining of the remaining chemotherapy
from the pump, on Friday, October 20, and for the next five days I experienced
quite a lot of discomfort, or – to be more explicit – pain in my abdomen. I had
experienced similar difficulties in previous rounds after the draining of the
pump, but those had gone away. These didn’t. I wasn’t in a lot of pain but I was in pain (Sloan Kettering uses a 0 to 10 pain
scale in which, as a nurse said to us, childbirth is a 10, and the breaking of
a major bone is an 8; I was more like a 3), and it was persistent. The
oncologist’s nurse felt that this was a form of acid reflux, which apparently
the use of the pump – any use, including draining it and injecting inert
substances instead, as they’d done with me on October 20 – can cause. But on
Wednesday night the pain made it difficult to sleep, and so I reluctantly took
a pain pill. (I would have preferred not to, since I went to some effort to
wean myself off of pain pills months ago.) The pain pill helped a lot with the
pain, but jangled my sleep, and so the next day I called the oncologist’s
office to ask if I should change to another pain remedy that might provide
similar pain relief with fewer side effects.
In the course of that phone call I described my various
symptoms to the oncologist’s nurse. These included one that had no obvious
connection to the pain and discomfort I’d been feeling: an instance of – sorry,
there’s no more elegant way to put this – black stool. Black stool, as someone
at Sloan Kettering said to us, is a red flag, because black is the color that
blood takes on after it reacts with stomach acid. In other words, this was a
possible symptom of a bleeding ulcer or, it turned out, a variety of other
unpleasant things, including pancreatitis. So the nurse consulted the covering
physician, and the two of them sent me to the Sloan Kettering emergency room (“Urgent
Care”).
At Urgent Care they determined quite quickly that it was
very unlikely I had a bleeding ulcer or pancreatitis. Among other reasons for their conclusion was this: it
turns out that a common remedy for acid reflux, one that the oncologist’s nurse
had recommended, namely Pepto-Bismol, can produce black stools – and I had been
using Pepto-Bismol to try to deal with what was supposed to be acid reflux. I also
don’t think the Urgent Care folks were all that impressed by the pain I’d had, but they were
attentive to the results of the blood tests they ran. I get blood tests every
time I go to MSK, and the previous Friday, when the pump was drained, my liver
numbers had been fine and nothing else seemed dramatically wrong. But now my
liver numbers were not fine, and my impression is that various other numbers
were off too.
All of which seems to mean that my liver – that is, the
healthy parts of my liver -- finally experienced side effects from the new chemotherapy. I had inflammation of the liver, though by no means terrible inflammation. Looking
back, I suspect my liver had been reacting to previous rounds of chemotherapy too, just not as much;
I think that’s the true explanation for the post-chemo difficulties I’d been
having. The difference is that this time the difficulties were worse – and this time I got blood tests during the time those difficulties were in play, so
now there was evidence to show what was going on. (Why did the chemo seem
to affect me more after it stopped than while it was actually being infused
into my liver? I don’t know. Perhaps it’s just a matter of the passage of time:
the chemo doesn’t immediately disappear from the liver when the infusion ends, and
the longer it’s there the more impact it probably has. But I wonder whether another
factor might be that during the infusions my whole body, and specifically my
liver cells, are braced somehow against the chemo’s impact, and that once the
infusion stops, everything relaxes and then the impact gets felt.)
Anyway, once the doctors had an idea of what was happening,
fortunately they also had a response. They drained my pump again, and
this time inserted a mixture of inert substances and a steroid. So over the
next week or two my liver will get a slow infusion – about a milliliter a day –
of steroids, and this treatment should operate as an anti-inflammatory, as steroids
generally do against inflammation. The result may be that my next round of
treatment is postponed a bit, until my liver calms down, but hopefully that
will be all.
So, in short, with a pause for the anti-inflammatories to
work, I should soon be able to continue on the treatment which the scans a week and a half ago showed was working.
Of course, sorting all this out required a stay in Urgent
Care from about 7:30 PM Thursday to 3 AM Friday, when I was admitted to the MSK
hospital, and then I was a hospital patient for about 39 frustrating hours, from
3 AM Friday till about 6 PM Saturday. More on those 39 hours, perhaps, in
another post.
this is such an epic drama, Steve. It must have been a lot worse than a 3 if you were reluctantly required to change the word "discomfort" to the word "pain." I have the feeling you were a little too genteel considering the level of misery.
ReplyDeleteOther funny observation - you are such an academic - you actually put "black stool" as a keyword label. Just think of the people that will read about your black stool, and compare it to their black stool!! Anyway, get very well very soon, and sorry for the trauma you have to endure.
Steve. I wish you all the best. Fighting cancer is a pain but somehow we get through it. Scott, Nancy and I are always thinking of you. Howard
ReplyDelete