My wife Teresa and I went
to see our oncologist Friday, April 27. Based on that meeting, it looks like
we have a plan for what to do about my three (or conceivably four) rogue
tumors, and it’s a straightforward one: Sloan Kettering will probably treat
them with radioactive pellets of a substance called Yttrium.
This
is good on a bunch of counts. First, it means we don’t need to start traveling
somewhere for a clinical trial. Instead, I can continue to be treated by Sloan
Kettering, which knows my case and which is also easily available if something
goes wrong. The clinical trials we were beginning to think about were in
Boston, Bethesda (near Washington, D.C.) and Houston – not so convenient!
Second,
it means we’re not moving into the world of clinical trials of experimental
treatments. Those treatments are interesting and may be promising, but they are
all more or less unknown quantities. Using Yttrium pellets is considerably more
familiar territory.
Third,
our oncologist believes this treatment will make a real difference. We were
concerned that there might be no point in attacking these rogue tumors by
themselves, and that instead we might need to completely switch
my treatment plan. We were worried that even if a selective attack on just
these tumors destroyed them, more would spring up as soon as these were dealt
with. But the oncologist said that she doesn’t treat things just because
they’re there; she wants the treatment to make long-term sense. Why does going
after these tumors make sense? The very encouraging answer is that she
thinks the biology of my particular cancer is in my favor; my cancer – with the
exception of the tumors we’re going to attack -- seems slow-moving and uninterested
in leaving my liver. She feels that I’m an outlier among cholangiocarcinoma
patients – in a good way. (Of course I say all this with fingers crossed!)
This
won’t be a done deal until we go see the “interventional radiologist” who would
actually do the Yttrium treatment, who not incidentally already works closely
with our oncologist. Conceivably he could recommend some other way to
proceed, but that doesn’t seem likely. Assuming we go ahead with this
approach, there’d be a session with the interventional radiologist for him to
map the targets in my liver, and then another session for the actual procedure.
Chemotherapy may also get added to the mix.
The procedure itself, as I understand it, is called “selective
internal radiation therapy” (SIRT), and, aside from the fact that I hope
it works, it’s really pretty amazing to learn about. In this treatment, they
run a catheter from my groin via the femoral artery up to the liver, and then
they send tiny glass beads infused with Yttrium-90 – millions of them! --
through this catheter. The beads embed themselves in the tumors’ blood vessels
(this is clever of them – it’s a result of there being more blood flow in the
tumors than in the healthy liver around them). Then they emit radiation, almost
all of it within about 11 days and traveling only a quite short distance, so
the rest of me shouldn’t be much affected. Meanwhile I go home, I believe the
same day as the procedure. Side effects are likely to be mild. Direct effects
on the tumors, I hope, will not be mild but intense.
And that’s the plan!
Nuke those suckers! Thinking of you, Rachel
ReplyDeleteI have learned more about the state of current cancer treatment therapies from your blog, than any other source. Meanwhile, this latest plan sounds like the most manageable procedure, for many reasons. Good luck with the interventionist radiologist. Anxious to hear the outcome. You and Teresa are in my heart, always.
ReplyDelete